|
|
Post by RELLIK on Feb 1, 2006 15:26:06 GMT -5
well i wasnt gonna continue the off topic-ness so im putting my post here.
bush just wants to please his daddy follow his footsteps and then get the money like sonic said. bush did a horrible job going into iraq. he had no right and no business. osama was with terrorists not f3CKIN SADAM!! as for pearl harbor well i dont pay too much attention to history most id rather forget but didnt they release the nukes on japan after that. if it were another president like al gore i cant judge his potential cuz i havent seen him president. still the fact that he practically handed over an election because supposedly the people of america wanted bush to be president, well lets just say i think he cares about the people of america more than bush who attends no funerals, etc. if bush continues to stay president there will be another civil war. its already beginning. still it would only start if he is once again re-elcted cuz as if stated there is too much controversy. i mean if its been said he was behind 911 then hell how did he get re-elected. which creates even more controversy. if bush is an "innocent"/"good" man then he should pull back a bit. he'll ruin his rep. its like a guy who gets accused of sexual assault.
|
|
swimstud600
Guest
Member is offline
|
Post by swimstud600 on Feb 1, 2006 15:53:15 GMT -5
Hey speaking of pearl harbor, the japs attacked us, not germany. Does that mean we shouldn't have gone to war with hitler? I agree that we should have gone into iraq, but we should have been out of it by now. Let the iraqis defend their own country, our job is over.
|
|
|
|
Post by RELLIK on Feb 1, 2006 16:18:08 GMT -5
so the japs attacked "you" wtf would you launch a nuke? welll simple to shhow this: power and DONT fudge WITH US> thats the problem. i think america has too much global power and need to heel doggy heel if ya know what i mean. as for war agianst hitler i say no. simply kill the one guy and then the rest dont know what to do. racism is an excuse for taking anger out on a living thing. and going into iraq was not necesary at all. i mean its like hitler. take out sadam and they will fall. not too mention it was to just "checj" if they had weapons of mass destruction no? i think its evident they would have nukes i mean they still make em in the us even though they arent suppost to. its an "emergency" to protect there people or their religion or their money etc. just about every country does this.
|
|
swimstud600
Guest
Member is offline
|
Post by swimstud600 on Feb 1, 2006 16:24:27 GMT -5
take out sadam and they will fall. That's kind of what I was getting at. Sadam's gone, we know there are no weapons, we should not be in Iraq anymore. |
|
|
|
Post by Nightmare on Feb 1, 2006 18:56:26 GMT -5
1. Honestly, I think Al Gore is mentally retarded.
2. I love America because of all our F**king power! I'd rather live in America than some wussy country.
3. There's no chance of another civila war starting. That's just asanine.
4. We went to Iraq because that were dangerous and threatening us.
5. We attacked Hitler because he was killing all of our allies overseas.
6. We're still in Iraq because we're trying to hold off the terrorists that still think that comunism should remain in power in Iraq. We're keeping things under control while the country recovers.
and last but not least
7. There seems to be and imbalance on ZV politically. Too many Liberal wieners and not enough Right wing nut jobs..>.<
|
|
|
|
Post by Tony on Feb 1, 2006 19:13:04 GMT -5
ok, im going to sate my opinion and then im never going to come to this thread again.
both rebuplicans and demicrats are morons, bush has no idea what he's doing, we are on the fast track to hell, and as i stated in the pointless thred, we will soon be voteing for plants.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nightmare on Feb 1, 2006 19:16:29 GMT -5
I'm not going to say I agree that we're on a fast track to hell, but when it comes right down to it, as far as politics go, everyone's a moron.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fusion on Feb 1, 2006 19:38:44 GMT -5
I'm neither for the war on terror, nor against it. I want the troops to come back, though; to be re-briefed and PROPERLY equipped (as in, REAL protection) THEN re-deployed so we can actually begin to win.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nightmare on Feb 1, 2006 19:50:16 GMT -5
Uhh, we are winning. But like you said, they need new equpiment. It's been proven that due to the harsh conditions in the middle east, the armor our troops are being given isn't as effective. Our stuff wasn't built for it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ztrl on Feb 1, 2006 20:02:46 GMT -5
very funny rellik
¯_¯||
|
|
|
|
Post by RELLIK on Feb 2, 2006 0:09:33 GMT -5
htf do you call a country a "wussy". power isnt the answer to solving or winnning a war. in war all sides lose. seems the goal in iraq is to win not stop or solve. too much power in one place and theres bound to be problems. i think its good hitlers dead but launching a frickin nuke on innocent people is disgraceful. if your doing the right thing now in iraq how come it wasnt done in japan? but i aint gonna talk about the past cuz nobody really knows what happened anyways. everyone puts trust in the guy on top. liberals democrats etc. all of these are simply social groups trying to distinguish themselves. its how countries, kingdoms and everything else were started. and as usual theres people brain washed, under an influence etc. its just sucking up. right now if you were in a "wussy" country like iraq (im assuming thats what you mean) you would be doing what launching missiles instead of going in with guns. as far as im concerned if you have a man sitting on your country's throne and his own ass isnt on the front line then your having yourself labeled as a wussy country. if bush wants people to get killed for his money let em kill people but he should be doing it not making soldiers get killed. i dont see how its being kept under control.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nightmare on Feb 2, 2006 0:56:56 GMT -5
Well, Rellik, I see where you're coming from, but when it comes to war, sometimes innocents die. If it were up do me, we would all just nuke anyone that gives us any crap, but that's why people like me aren't president.
And when I said "wussy country" I wasn't reffering to Iraq. I was reffering to much wussier countries.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ztrl on Feb 2, 2006 8:48:09 GMT -5
the only thing a country is are "lines" on a map wich is made of "paper"
WE ALL LIVE ON THE SAME PEICE OF ROCK SO STFU AND GET OVER IT!
|
|
|
|
Post by Sonic on Feb 2, 2006 12:15:34 GMT -5
Speaking of wussy countries Nightmare, I think we'll lose our superpower status if this crap continues. Our deficit is already well into the trillions, (there's a record to remember Bush by)and it'll keep skyrocketing due to all the reconstruction we're going to have to do in Iraq. And China is doing spectacularly due to how cheap their products are and how efficiently they're exporting them. I fear if our debt keeps up, China will be the next superpower. Us losing superpower status to China? It sounds asinine, as you say, but it will happen eventually.
|
|
darkreaver
Guest
Member is offline
|
Post by darkreaver on Feb 2, 2006 15:48:53 GMT -5
the only thing a country is are "lines" on a map wich is made of "paper" WE ALL LIVE ON THE SAME PEICE OF ROCK SO STFU AND GET OVER IT! Couldn't agree more... |
|
