swimstud600
Guest
Member is offline
|
Post by swimstud600 on Feb 2, 2006 15:56:12 GMT -5
Wars shouldn't even be fought with soldiers. They should just lock the leaders in a room togather for 24 hours and the one alive the next day wins.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sonic on Feb 3, 2006 8:34:18 GMT -5
Well crap, I doubt that physically Bush is stronger than Saddam. Saddam would just bodyslam the crap out of Bush and it would be the end.  |
|
swimstud600
Guest
Member is offline
|
Post by swimstud600 on Feb 3, 2006 15:59:03 GMT -5
Ya probably. If that was how wars worked I'd elect Arnold president in a heartbeat.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sonic on Feb 6, 2006 8:58:33 GMT -5
lol yea he'd take care of everything |
|
|
|
Post by RELLIK on Feb 6, 2006 18:06:16 GMT -5
Well crap, I doubt that physically Bush is stronger than Saddam. Saddam would just bodyslam the crap out of Bush and it would be the end. lol. but i think sadam would do more then that. |
|
|
|
Post by Knuckles on Feb 7, 2006 14:19:41 GMT -5
the war in iraq was illegal
get that through your heads. there were NO WMDs
and people who hate communism are idiots. its fine to hate the communist leaders who have failed and been dictators, but communism IS the best system. in it all are equal, its just that everyone who has tried it has failed so far.
bush is a moron and people who voted for him are too
nuking japan was rong, face it
and finally the tactics with iraq are completely wrong, they shouldnt have invaded. it is never ok to kill innocents
i think swimstud had the best idea. or they shoud all just play red alert of something with simulation aremies, and the loser should accept defeat and give up to avoid loss of life XD
|
|
|
|
Post by Nightmare on Feb 7, 2006 18:42:32 GMT -5
the war in iraq was illegal get that through your heads. there were NO WMDs and people who hate communism are idiots. its fine to hate the communist leaders who have failed and been dictators, but communism IS the best system. in it all are equal, its just that everyone who has tried it has failed so far. bush is a moron and people who voted for him are too nuking japan was rong, face it and finally the tactics with iraq are completely wrong, they shouldnt have invaded. it is never ok to kill innocents i think swimstud had the best idea. or they shoud all just play red alert of something with simulation aremies, and the loser should accept defeat and give up to avoid loss of life XD * points* COMMIE! COMMIE! Communism is the worst system. Noones equal. You're all bossed around by some ass who treats his people like dirt. Does that sound equal? Nukeing Japan was a good decision, or would you rather we all be taken over by Hitler. If so.. * points* NAZI! NAZI! Bush is not a moron, people who hate Bush are morons. And there WERE weapons of mass destruction! Are you people f**king blind! We TOOK their weapons of mass destruction! We FOUND weapons of mass destruction!! You can't say there were none if we found them and took them! Put 2 and 2 togeather damnit! And as for innocents dieing, you're. Innocents shouldn't die, but hey, it happens sometimes. |
|
swimstud600
Guest
Member is offline
|
Post by swimstud600 on Feb 7, 2006 19:27:14 GMT -5
the war in iraq was illegal get that through your heads. there were NO WMDs and people who hate communism are idiots. its fine to hate the communist leaders who have failed and been dictators, but communism IS the best system. in it all are equal, its just that everyone who has tried it has failed so far. bush is a moron and people who voted for him are too nuking japan was rong, face it and finally the tactics with iraq are completely wrong, they shouldnt have invaded. it is never ok to kill innocents i think swimstud had the best idea. or they shoud all just play red alert of something with simulation aremies, and the loser should accept defeat and give up to avoid loss of life XD Wars are illegal. Harboring terrorists is illegal. Sadam did not attack us, we all know that, we're past that. But there are no good and bad terrorists. All terrorists are bad. Communism is the best system on paper but real life doesn't work that way. That's why the soviets fell, communism didn't work. Now if you are a communist that's your business, I personally don't want that. Bush has made alot of decisions that I don't agree with, and he's costing the country alot of money. But when it comes down to it, I trust him to protect America. I trust him to make mistakes and spend alot of cash but I trust him to keep us safer. Nuking japan was the right decision. As horrific as that was, the japenese were incredably fortified. All statistics say that if the nuke wasn't dropped the war could have gone on for another year, and even MORE people would have died than those who died in the nuke. Its horrific but in dropping the nuke we saved countless lives on both sides. You're right its not ok to kill innocents but that is what happens sometimes in war. Bin Laden himself said that if they weren't preoccupied with matters in Iraq, we'd have had another attack in the US by now. Then that would be OUR civilians. Get that through your heads. I like to stay in the middle politically but that had to be said. |
|
|
|
Post by Nightmare on Feb 7, 2006 20:13:15 GMT -5
Amen to that dude.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sonic on Feb 8, 2006 9:14:48 GMT -5
Like I said about bombing Japan, I kind of get mixed feelings there. On one hand, it did end the war pretty quickly, but on the other thousands of innocents died...and another reason I feel badly about it is because all the innocent Japanese people that were living here in America were stuck in internment camps, when they didn't even do anything. Imagine being locked up in your own damn country for not even doing anything wrong. Then the only way they were able to get out of those camps early was by going into the army, and guess what that led to? The Japanese were forced to bomb their freakin home country! Also about Bush, he's totally milking that "I'll keep America safe" BS just so people can think he's doing something. I doubt he's doing much to keep our country safer, as much as we want to think he is. He's got nothing else going for him since he's f*cked up so much already, so he figured "Hey, I'll go with the I'll keep America safe speech!" *NEWSFLASH* We aren't safe! We can easily be bombed again if the terrorists are careful enough!
|
|
|
|
Post by Tony on Feb 8, 2006 9:27:27 GMT -5
Like I said about bombing Japan, I kind of get mixed feelings there. On one hand, it did end the war pretty quickly, but on the other thousands of innocents died...and another reason I feel badly about it is because all the innocent Japanese people that were living here in America were stuck in internment camps, when they didn't even do anything. Imagine being locked up in your own damn country for not even doing anything wrong. Then the only way they were able to get out of those camps early was by going into the army, and guess what that led to? The Japanese were forced to bomb their freakin home country! Also about Bush, he's totally milking that "I'll keep America safe" BS just so people can think he's doing something. I doubt he's doing much to keep our country safer, as much as we want to think he is. He's got nothing else going for him since he's f*cked up so much already, so he figured "Hey, I'll go with the I'll keep America safe speech!" *NEWSFLASH* We aren't safe! We can easily be bombed again if the terrorists are careful enough! yeah, i know i said i would never come to this thread again, but.... i agree with all of that. simply put, bombing japan was both a good idea and a bad idea, and i highly doubt that George W. knows whats he's doing. lets face it, he's a red neck |
|
|
|
Post by Sonic on Feb 8, 2006 10:08:04 GMT -5
Yeah man, he's the biggest freakin redneck in the world. Finally someone agrees with me!  |
|
|
|
Post by Knuckles on Feb 8, 2006 12:32:12 GMT -5
* points* COMMIE! COMMIE! Communism is the worst system. Noones equal. You're all bossed around by some ass who treats his people like dirt. Does that sound equal? Nukeing Japan was a good decision, or would you rather we all be taken over by Hitler. If so.. * points* NAZI! NAZI! Bush is not a moron, people who hate Bush are morons. And there WERE weapons of mass destruction! Are you people f**king blind! We TOOK their weapons of mass destruction! We FOUND weapons of mass destruction!! You can't say there were none if we found them and took them! Put 2 and 2 togeather damnit! And as for innocents dieing, you're. Innocents shouldn't die, but hey, it happens sometimes. how is a system which is designed to make all equal the worst? like i said, it is simply that communist leaders so far have been failing. if we put in place a truely unselfish communist leader, where we are all equal, it would be perfect. IF DONE CORRECTLY it is the best. thats like saying capitalism sucks because there have been capitalist dictators as for no MWDS. look here news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3718150.stmwww.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2004-10-06-wmd_x.htmwww.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2004-03-02-un-wmd_x.htmas for bush not being a moron.. well im sorry but i dont know how you can say that. just look at him, he cant spell, cant string sentences together fully half the time, (choked on a pretzel XD), and didnt notice he was reading upside-down. to name but a few examples also look here chrisevans3d.com/files/iq.htmjus thought youd wanna see that and a few other things to help convince ya www.toostupidtobepresident.com/irregulartimes.com/stupid2.htmlwww.lifeisajoke.com/politics23_html.htmon a side note It isn't worth arguing with me unless you have undeniable proof. You WILL lose. Trust me. I am the Don of arguments, and will crush any argument with any flaws in it.thank you. come back with an answer when you have some PROOF or at least EVIDENCE  |
|
|
|
Post by Tony on Feb 8, 2006 12:38:41 GMT -5
how is a system which is designed to make all equal the worst? like i said, it is simply that communist leaders so far have been failing. if we put in place a truely unselfish communist leader, where we are all equal, it would be perfect. IF DONE CORRECTLY it is the best. it's the worst because it can never happen. being equal with everyone around you id just one of those thing that can't happen becuase of human nature. the only way for it to happen is from every one to be same, and by that i mean they mus look the same, act the same, everyone doing everything like every one else. that that would just be creepy. |
|
|
|
Post by Knuckles on Feb 8, 2006 13:55:24 GMT -5
ya raise a fair point. so i cna respect you saying its the worst in that way. but its worth trying... i mean if we nationalise big industries, there is less incentive to grow into a multinational, so people dont get as rich. therefore goods are cheaper and people can own more and are better off.
communism wouldnt even need to work fully, it just needs to have a good leader who isnt corrupt. if we had a president/prime minister/king/whatever your county's leader is that is good, and a communist, we would be better off.
the problem is, that a communist leader is a exception to the rule as he/she owns all the power. a government is what is needed i guess, so it cant be too corrupted. communism has a bad image, cas they were the "bad guys" in the cold war, and cas castro and stalin and all the big leaders so far have failed horribly. communism needs a new posterboy
and for the record, i am not a commie, simply because there is no good commie leaders XD
|
|
